Archive for the ‘Curious Minds’ Category

Not an ‘Offer’ but ‘Models’

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

 

Perhaps it’s time to stop talking about a ‘cultural offer’. This week I took part a fascinating discussion between Liverpool City Region Find Your Talent partners and Damian Allen, Executive Director for Children and Family Services in Knowsley. It’s always encouraging to spend time with people like Damian who are committed advocates for the power of culture in children and young people’s lives and it was clear that Knowsley will be doing whatever they can to ensure that the opportunities that have been developed through Find Your Talent are maintained, despite the funding cuts. The most interesting part of the conversation focussed on the changes that the cultural sector needs to make in order to embed creative and cultural activity at the heart of communities in a way that makes culture real and relevant in those settings. Damian set out a timely challenge to the cultural sector, based around the need to move from an ‘offer’ to a ‘model’ and I think he’s absolutely right about this.

Cultural organisations certainly work hard to extend their offer through both outreach programmes and innovative approaches to attracting new audiences, but I’ve believed for a while now that it doesn’t matter how wonderful your outreach programme is when you are working in settings where perceptions of culture as being ‘not for us’ are deeply entrenched. The development of cultural capital requires the establishment of new delivery and development models that begin with recognising and valuing the existing cultural assets of a community and building upon them, rather than the operation of established paternalistic and deficit based models that still prevail. So the ‘offer’ needs to be replaced by a ‘model’ of cultural development which is deeply rooted in the everyday experience of people and is relevant and meaningful to that context. As participation  in locality-based and locality-relevant cultural activity grows, connections with cultural activity beyond the immediate locality and beyond existing fields of experience will inevitably be made through the intrinsic drivers of curiosity and ambition. As participation grows, it should be the responsibility of cultural development workers to broaden the community’s awareness of the possibilities available to them and to facilitate connections.

This has massive implications for the ways in which cultural organisations, particularly the larger ones, position and structure their activities. It is assumed that there is permanent value in the maintenance of large scale, high profile cultural institutions that are rich in artefacts and histories and we would of course be foolish to neglect the strength and richness of these treasures. But now, more than any other time in the recent history of cultural development, is the time to radically reorganise how we develop cultural capital and cultural participation with models that are affordable and relevant and start by valuing the community’s existing cultural assets.

I believe that schools have a vital role in this and should see themselves as centres for cultural development – connecting outwards to the communities around them and developing capabilities for resilient and sustainable living through cultural capacity building. This has obvious links to ideas emerging from the new government’s Big Society thinking – I wonder what role culture will play in that.

Curious Minds is currently developing tools that schools can use to examine their role as cultural hubs. If you are interested in this area of work, do get in touch.

Chris May

Developing Cultural Capital

Friday, June 4th, 2010

I’ve been working on ideas about the development of Cultural Capital. My belief is that a radical shift in Cultural Policy development is needed to make the link between developing Cultural Capital and broader thinking about creating a sustainable and equitable future and addressing social exclusion. Here’s a start at sharing what I think. Comments are very welcome.

 Active participation in culture. i.e. the development of Cultural Capital, builds social and community capital.

Cultural Capital is made up of a combination of:

  • People – all people
  • Capabilities – skills, dispositions, attitudes
  • Collective experiences, shared narratives and histories
  • Means of communication – technologies and languages
  • Networks, connections, partnerships and collectives.
  • Physical assets – spaces, buildings, artworks, resources for making
  • Intellectual capital – ideas and knowledge

 

Capabilities developed through culture are core capabilities for sustainable living, i.e. the ability to:

  • Imagine, and persuasively communicate the results of imaginative activity through dialogue
  • Work in an adventurous and enterprising manner, embracing risk and uncertainty
  • Co- create solutions with others, working flexibly in a spirit of collaboration and sharing
  • Persist and overcome barriers to change, sustaining motivation with achievements
  • Continuously reflect and refine, inviting new perspectives and solutions
  • Work in an emotionally intelligent manner, developing individual and collective resilience through authentic relationship building
  • Work ethically for the common good, grounding practice in values and sharing ideas freely
  • Use resources wisely, minimising negative environmental impacts while maximising environmental improvements.
  • Value and celebrate beauty, pleasure and playfulness.

 

Cultural capital can be developed fruitfully if key philosophical principles are applied:

  • Valuing the centrality of individual and collective agency, and authorship of cultural production by community members in the development of shared cultural capital
  • Continuously striving for excellence and innovation in cultural production
  • The recognition of creativity as a universal human attribute rather than a gift of the few
  • A commitment to broadening definitions of cultural worth and to understanding the impact of culture
  • A determination to achieve equity of access and resource distribution
  • A persistence in seeing all space as cultural space
  • A valuing of diversity as a key engine of innovation
  • A commitment to continuous learning about and through culture as a core feature of education
  • A commitment to celebrating culture as a source of joy and pride across the whole of society.

Chris May

A flying visit to Oman

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

It has been a remarkable weekend. I had been invited by Jakira Khanam from the British Council/VSO Global Youth Xchange programme, to deliver a training workshop in Muscat, the capital of Oman. So having landed in Muscat at 4 am on Saturday, I started work later that day at 8 at the British Council offices.

The purpose of the workshop was to work with a group of organising partners from the British Council, The Ministry of Social Development and The United Nations Population Fund together with a small group of young adult volunteers who are working to improve the lives of young people in Oman, and establish the foundations for the forthcoming Youth Xchange programme between young people from Oman, Yemen and Birmingham taking place in Birmingham and subsequently in Oman this year and next.

My theme was ‘Creative Community Engagement’ and the workshop gave me the opportunity to test the model for cultural capacity building that I’ve been sharing in this blog recently. Also involved in delivery was Lizzie Moore, from Changemakers – an organisation that works to increase young people’s volunteering, and which will be involved in the hosting of the Birmingham phase of the programme.

Regular readers will know that I spent three weeks in Oman this January as a participant in the British Council’s Global Xchange programme – a truly inspirational visit that resulted in many shifts in perception for me. So it was wonderful to be back in the country, making new friends and connecting with the dear friends I made earlier in the year. Spending social time in Oman is always a remarkable experience, as the hospitality , warmth and openness of the people is an inspiration.

Sometimes groups gel in a magical way, and this was one such instance. Our conversations were very open, varied, full of challenges and incredibly interesting. There was a real appetite for working creatively and for creating opportunities for artists to become more involved in the development of socially orientated activity. I have great hope for the forthcoming programme. The temperature in Oman varied between 38 and 45 degrees, so getting around had to be carefully managed, but we managed to enjoy a visit to the souk and enjoy meals with friends. As a result of the learning that came out of the workshop I’ve revised our Cultural Capacity Building Framework. See below for details. 

By 10.45 on Monday morning I was back on a plane heading back for the UK – pretty exhausted, but with a renewed enthusiasm for international collaborations of this nature. Curious Minds is very pleased to have been asked to contribute and we look forward to  further partnership work with the Global Xchange programme and of course with our Omani friends.

Any comments on the framework are welcome and check out Changemakers’ work – they are a great organisation. http://changemakers.org.uk/

 Chris May

The Curious Minds approach

All projects are designed in response to the specific needs of our funding partners and are grounded in principles of partnership and collaboration. We do not offer ‘off-the-shelf’ packages, preferring instead to co-develop programmes with the people with whom we are working, in order that the results lead to sustained change. Our approach is characterised by the following stages:

 

KEY FACTORS

DESCRIPTION

SKILLS & CAPABILITIES

1. Attitudes We approach every programme with an attitude of respect, humility, care and sensitivity Respectfulness, patience,  concern for the well-being of others, readiness to learn, curiosity, humility.
2. Research We develop our understanding of the context in which we will be working, consulting with partners to be aware of political and social drivers,  local histories, demographics and dynamics. Research skills, analytical skills – recording,  networking skills, location specific knowledge.
3. Presence We establish a meaningful presence by being creative, interested and interesting. We develop relationships, focus on listening and demonstrate the ability to connect, engage and involve. Creativity, expressiveness, cultural sensitivity, listening. 
4. Valuing Assets We map existing assets, researching the area in which we are working to better understand the physical and social infrastructure, aiming to identify, value and build upon those assets. Communication, listening, enabling dialogue, recording, presenting.
5. Working with leaders We identify and recruit local champions and leaders as partners, aiming to develop the capacity of existing leaders, grow local assets and empower community members. Diplomacy, relationship building, communication, influencing.
6.Co-Designing & Planning We work with partners in a solutions-focussed manner to design and plan practical ways to build on existing assets and overcome obstacles to progress, co-creating needs-based projects and programmes which lead to tangible outcomes.  Negotiation – communication – creativity – working systematically – partnership working – co-construction, completing, showing
7. Reflecting and learning We carefully evaluate impact, learning, change and distance travelled, ensuring objectives are agreed by all partners. We encourage everyone to see everything as an opportunity for learning, building quality by reflecting on success and failure, and constantly adapting and changing in response to needs and feedback. Evaluation skills, communication, questioning, analysis, enabling refection.
8. Celebrating and sharing We celebrate progress, welcome visitors, share learning in networks and publicise successes widely. Writing, documenting, presenting, communicating, networking.
9. Broadening and Sustaining We constantly broaden the range of partners involved, the types of activity on offer and the breadth of experience available, reaching out to include more people, while ensuring that developments and changes are sustained and sustainable.  Working inclusively, proactive outreach, using networks

A busy week focussing on solutions

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Our staff team has now spent two highly profitable days looking at the place of Solutions Focused Coaching in the development of our organisation. It has been a real revelation. Phil Aspden and Janice McNamara from Summerhouses http://www.summer-houses.org.uk/ did a fantastic job and helped us realize how ‘problem focussed’ our approach has been at times. The ethos of the solutions-focused approach chimes exactly with our method of building cultural capital, which is essentially an ‘asset valuing’ model. It was highly refreshing to see things from a fresh perspective and great to spend two days together as a team.

We also spent an interesting evening in the company of some key stakeholders in Lancashire, Blackburn and Blackpool at a ‘Discuss and Dine’ event we held at Stanley House in Blackburn last Wednesday, with support from Arts Council, North West. Participants were glad of the opportunity to connect with colleagues from a range of disciplines related to creative and cultural education and there was a broad consensus that more networking events of this nature are vital. We’ll be looking into how we might do more of this. A number of key themes emerged:

  • The importance of communicating the impact of creative and cultural learning in clear and persuasive language that policy makers will listen to.
  • The importance of cultural organisations becoming ‘commission ready’ and working closely with other partners in the third sector to connect commissioners meaningfully with communities.
  • The need for a sharper focus on creativity and culture within inspection regimes – if it’s inspected it will get done.
  • The need for young people’s voice to feature at the core of our advocacy.

There was much else and a full report will be appearing shortly on our website. Thanks particularly to Gladys Rhodes, Strategic Director of Children’s Services in Blackburn with Darwen, who was a passionate and leading voice during the conversation. It was encouraging to witness the level of commitment and creativity Gladys and others were demonstrating. Thanks also to everyone else who supported the event – plenty of food for thought. 

Do get in touch if you’d like to participate in similar events in the future or have ideas for improving networking opportunities.

Chris May

Our new friends from the Netherlands

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Last week we had the privilege of welcoming Frits De Dreu and Klees Bouwman, teachers from the University of Professional Education in Utrecht (Hogeschool Utrecht), to Liverpool. I love these opportunities for dialogue with international colleagues and it was a huge pleasure to share ideas and a meal with Frits and Kees. Our visitors were particularly interested in the Creative Partnerships programme and the lessons that might be learned from our experience of developing complex partnerships in schools. It would seem that the gap between rhetoric and action is significant in The Netherlands – they are not alone.

It was fascinating to discover how some social workers are trained in universities in The Netherlands to become Cultural and Social and Development Professionals (CMV – Culturelle en Maatschappelijke Vorming). This seems to be a inspired model for developing social and cultural capital through social work – connecting social objectives with cultural objectives in ways that resonate with my own ideas about developing social capital through cultural development, and cultural capital through community capacity building.(See my last post for a description of the principles that underpin this model).

‘The CMV practitioner’s focus is on increasing and strengthening the competencies that enable people to stand on their own feet and shape their life qualitatively. He does this by challenging individuals, groups, organisations and communities to take part in social and cultural activities and projects.’

 Alert & Enterprising 2.0 – National CMV Programme Consultation Group 2009

 About three thousand students are currently being trained in CMV in the Netherlands and the professional competencies they work towards have many similarities with the competency framework we developed for Creative Agents a few years ago.

The Dutch competencies are divided into three categories

A. Social – agogic action – the business of teaching, doing, leading, facilitating

1.Exploration, research analysis – understanding the social context where the work will take place.

2. Making contact and giving leadership – recognising the leaders and key partners in the social context.

3. Design and development – of suitable programmes that ‘give form to social life’.

4. Organisation, networking, mediation ‘so that participants are enabled to attain the goal they set for themselves’

 

B. Entrepreneurial action

5. Entrepreneurial and organization-oriented action – ‘contributing to the business like aspects of the organisation’

6. Entrepreneurial and strategic action – seeing the connections between the work and that of others and formulating long term perspectives.

 

C. Professional Development

7. Development of own professionalism – reflective practice and learning

8. Development of professional practice and professional action – contributing to the development of professional practice

9. Presentation of a professional profile, legitimisation and acquisition of public support – gaining public support for the profession

 

I’m just beginning to get a sense of how this works in action and it’s fascinating to contemplate how complex social problems are being tackled through a project based approach – working with communities to develop their capacity to find their own solutions collectively.

A particularly interesting aspect of the competencies is the focus on entrepreneurship. I think it’s fair to say that here in Britain, entrepreneurship would not feature highly in social work training. It’s an interesting idea that merits consideration. I’ll keep you posted on partnership arrangements that develop. In the meantime if you are interested in how culture builds social capital, please get in touch

Thanks for your inspirational ideas Frits and Kees!

chris.may@curiousminds.org.uk

Connected and Cohesive Learning Communities

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

 Last Tuesday our principal funder Creativity, Culture and Education (CCE) supported us in holding the second in a series of seminars hosted by Creative Partnerships Schools of Creativity. These seminars aim to bring together classroom based examples, academic reflection and experimental practice in a twilight CPD session, and are designed to be of interest to leading practitioners, Creative Agents and experienced teachers from both within and beyond the Creative Partnerships programme.

As is always the case, Accrington Academy were excellent hosts and worked closely with us to deliver a session that was designed to promote dialogue and debate on the theme of developing cohesive and connected learning communities. We wanted to explore how key elements of practice developed within the CP programme could be transferred to other programmes and how this transfer can impact on the development of innovative practice. The particular subject focus was on work related to the Government’s Preventing Violent Extremism (Prevent) strategy, and community cohesion initiatives, both of which are being proactively addressed in highly original ways by Accrington Academy. An idea we wanted to test in the seminar was whether building ‘connected and cohesive’ schools – that is schools where authentic connections based on genuine dialogue between pupils and their peers, teachers and pupils, teachers and other teachers and the school and its community, with these connections facilitated by rich programmes of creative learning – is realistic in the current educational context. We started the seminar with a provocation from students at the Academy in the form of an audio presentation – they asked four questions which reflected the subjects they want to talk about and that they feel are perhaps not given enough space in education. They asked:

Culture, what culture – does Britain have a culture?

Community – what is our community?

Safe, how safe? To feel safe in our community should we take risks?

 Us, who us? Do you really know us and are you really ready to let us decide what we talk about?

And we added a fifth – How can schools build connected learning communities?

 

Following this, seminar participants moved into a large space where they were invited to participate in a couple of short creative workshops designed to generate interesting responses to the questions posed by young people.

• William Titley’s workshop explored the nature of community through devising a happy families style card game.

• Sean Creagh delved deep into a surreal world exploring risk, using a mixture of children’s toys, a risk questionnaire, an expression of losses and gains arising from risk and an encounter with the ‘kiln of fear’.

• Our good friend Abbas Shah, (he touchingly brought with him his Passport to Creativity which was sent to him as an invitation to our original Creative Partnerships launch event five years ago!) explored connections by encouraging people to build interconnected 3 dimensional structures.

• Matt Davies provoked discussion about listening to young people, inviting guests to paint significant words on gigantic sheets of wall-mounted paper.

• Shahida Ahmed explored ‘does Britain have a culture’ by constructing a large outline of Britain on the floor and inviting participants to construct simple structures symbolising their ideas and the connections between them.

The atmosphere in the hall was terrific and much conversation was generated in a spirit of playfulness and fun. After sharing a few reflections on the experience, we moved back into the discussion room and listed to three short presentations about Prevent-related practice.

Superintendent Andy Pratt from Lancashire Constabulary (funders of The Art of Prevention project that we ran in Lancashire schools last year), shared his thoughts on how creative approaches were helping schools engage in an agenda which is fraught with difficulties and complexity. Briefly setting out the evolving nature of extremist threat to our society (which increasingly features attacks or attempted attacks from far right fascist groups), Andy urged school partners to make Prevent their business and extolled the value of creative approaches to this work.

Andy O’Brien, Deputy Head at Accrington Academy and Jez Dolan, their School of Creativity Creative Agent, then told the story of their involvement in the Art of Prevention and subsequent linked projects. It was clear from their narrative that, difficult as this work is, there is a real appetite among young people for engaging in challenging conversations and that generating an authentic dialogue in the school and with the surrounding community is generating exciting opportunities for learning.

I rounded off this session setting out what I feel are the key principles that we apply to all our projects, many of which we’ve learned about from our delivery of Creative Partnerships. Other ideas in this list are grounded in our philosophy of growing cultural capital through community development while growing social capital through cultural development. I shared a draft version of this in an earlier posting, but here is the latest version of these principles.

The Curious Minds approach

All projects are designed in response to the specific needs of our funding partners and are grounded in principles of partnership and collaboration. We do not offer ‘off-the-shelf’ packages, preferring instead to co-develop programmes with the people with whom we are working, in order that the results lead to sustained change. Our approach is characterised by the following stages:

  1. We approach every programme with an attitude of respect, humility, care and sensitivity
  2. We develop our understanding of the context in which we will be working, consulting with partners to be aware of political and social drivers, local histories, demographics and dynamics.
  3. We map existing assets, researching the area in which we are working to better understand the physical and social infrastructure, aiming to identify and value those assets.
  4. We identify and recruit local champions and leaders, aiming to develop the capacity of existing leaders, grow local assets and empower community members.
  5. We establish a meaningful presence by being creative, interested and interesting.
  6. We develop relationships, focus on listening and demonstrate the ability to connect, engage and involve.
  7. We work with partners to identify gaps and barriers to progress, and find ways for the community to overcome these themselves.
  8.  We co-create needs based programmes of activity tailored specifically to the context.
  9. We work in a purposeful manner which leads to tangible outcomes that everyone can understand. We constantly broaden the range of partners involved, the types of activity on offer and the breadth of experience available.
  10. We carefully evaluate impact, learning, change and distance travelled. Ensuring objectives are shared and fully owned. We encourage everyone to see everything as an opportunity for learning and build quality by reflecting on success and failure, constantly adapting and changing in response to changing needs and informed feedback.
  11.  We celebrate progress, welcome visitors, share learning in networks and publicise successes widely.
  12.  We ensure developments and changes are sustained and sustainable.

 Following these presentations, the final session of the seminar was a group discussion where participants shared ideas that the provocation, workshops and presentations had stimulated. The pressures that schools are constantly under from government, which commonly make it difficult to generate the necessary time for authentic dialogue in schools, inevitably were at the fore. I rounded off proceedings with a list of the factors I feel are necessary to bring about the sort of changes that will enable schools to become connected and cohesive learning communities.

 

• Determined and distributed leadership

• A long-term and whole school commitment to change

• Creative teaching and learning across the school, based on dialogue and co-constructed learning

• A shift in power and control – young people’s voice respected, valued and acted upon

• An outward facing school – connected through rich and diverse partnerships

• Activity fully integrated into curriculum planning

 The detail of this conversation can be found soon at CCE’s website where a report of the seminar, together with a podcast of discussions and presentations will be available.

So what did we learn? Time will tell, but hopefully participants went away with a clearer sense of the ways in which creative learning techniques can stimulate discussion about difficult issues and how schools can become more cohesive and connected in their approach to teaching and learning. At times there was a degree of reticence from some of the teachers present, which may of course simply be a reflection that this event took place at the end of another busy day’s teaching – but I wonder whether, in the current climate, that the challenge of talking about contentious issues, with young people’s views really at the heart of the conversation, is still just too difficult to do in school.

 

Many thanks again to Accrington Academy, CCE, all our other partners, practitioners, visual note takers Jennie and Claire and all the seminar participants for making this event a success.

For more information about Curious Minds’ work on Prevent please go to: www.curiousminds.org.uk

For details of this and other seminars in the series visit CCE’s website at: http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/

Chris May

Curious Project 6

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Yesterday afternoon we were delighted to launch the new website for Curious Project 6 at the ACE centre in Nelson. The project is exploring how young people can become practically engaged in regeneration and renewal projects in their own communities, and yesterday about fifty or so people turned up to learn about progress. Katy McCormick, from Regenerate Pennine  Lancashire introduced proceedings and Peter Little, Petra Wilson and Lynne Mitchell shared case studies of their work with young people in Blackburn, Colne and Bradley.

As a result of our project manager, Paul Hartley’s drive and determination to make this a success, much has been achieved. Primarily this new website which sits within the main Curious Minds website, is now available as a resource for anyone involved in renewal and regeneration. It contains guidance on setting up projects, a directory of creative practitioners who are experienced in developing this kind of work and some useful case studies to demonstrate how young people are currently involved in regeneration projects across Pennine Lancashire.  Have a look at the website at http://www.curiousminds.org.uk/curiousproject6/

 Crucial to the website’s success will be the extent to which a ‘community of practice’ feeds it. There  is a forum space for people to share ideas or pose questions and challenges and we are also inviting people to contribute their own case studies. If you use it, it will grow, and we’ll do our best to nurture that process.

All this has been possible due to great support from Lancashire County Council, Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council and Regenerate Pennine Lancashire – thanks to them for helping us get this far.

It’s clear that involving young people in projects of this nature generates a huge range of benefits. The projects featured on the website show that enabling young people’s engagement develops skills and attitudes that can really help them in other aspects of their lives. Projects have been demonstrated to reduce antisocial behaviour, increase volunteering and help bridge the gap that exists between generations. If we fail to engage young people in the regeneration of their own communities we’re really missing a trick. The energy, ideas and enthusiasm young people bring to any partnership are always inspirational – and we need to remember that the homes, facilities and spaces that are being designed, will be theirs in the long term – not ours.

 

Chris May

Growing Communities

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

In my twenties I worked as a gardener for five years. It was joyous but hard work. In 1987 I became a primary school teacher in Bristol. Working in early years settings convinced me that gardening, food production and cooking could act as a basis for pretty much all learning in the primary curriculum, as the children were utterly enthused and absorbed when they were practically engaged in these life affirming pursuits, and learned effortlessly, their creativity and curiosity  constantly stimulated and nourished by the natural world around them. What’s more, gardening made them happy and they loved learning outdoors. Dismayed with the educational policies of the eighties and nineties, like so many others who loved teaching but disliked schools, I left teaching and pursued different paths.

It is hugely exciting now to see that ideas about food, the environment and learning are permeating the educational landscape with renewed energy and vigour. Within our own Creative Partnerships programme we observe an increasing number of projects focussing on growing food.  This week it was a great privilege to meet up with my friend Paul Clarke to discuss his new book  Growing Sustainable Communities – Our Great Work, which will be published later this year. I’ve been sharing ideas with Paul for the last year or so and it has been a fascinating ongoing discussion, as there are so many resonances between his ideas for developing sustainable learning communities and the work we are doing in Curious Minds to recognise the value of schools as hubs for community capacity building through creativity and culture.

Paul is as passionate as it gets about the need to address the crisis that is staring us in the face. Put simply, we cannot go on ignoring the fact that we are destroying our planet and in the process are holding onto a model of education that is contributing to unsustainability. Paul suggests we need to develop radical solutions to address our foolish addiction to progress through consumerism, and our short-sighted adherence to the idea that inexorable growth is the solution. The answer, he says,  is to rethink our relationship with the environment and to totally rethink our concept of schools.

What I love about this work is its radicalism. Paul doesn’t hold back from suggesting a total redesign of the ways in which schools work, and his vision for schools as the core of community renaissance programmes that emphasise the need for all learning to be grounded in a full appreciation of  environmental action which starts with the growing of food, is compelling. The book is full of detailed and careful thinking about both why we have to act and how we might move forwards. The inspirational community gardening and learning initiative – Incredible Edible – based where Paul lives in Todmorden (and which is spreading across the country and the globe), is referenced as an effective model for community capacity building that is demonstrating the power of these ideas when they are realised in action.

Paul’s ideas make absolute sense to me and I look forward to exploring further how we can work together to test them in practice with our school partners and in other settings. My own view is that we should take a hard look at the sort of growth  we should aspire to as a society. Study after study would seem to reveal that the relentless pursuit of material growth produces no overall improvements in people’s happiness or well being; in fact the opposite seems true. So let’s aim for a growth in social justice, growth in mental wellbeing, growth in community cohesion and growth in imagination and spirit as a set of aims.  

I’m confident enough about the power of these ideas to make a prediction that in twenty years time it will be inconceivable for a school, wherever it is located, to be built without the inclusion of a food production and energy generation system that is fully integrated into both the fabric of the building and the fabric of the curriculum. We’ll look back at these risk averse times, where children spend ridiculous amounts of time shut up inside schools, missing out on the limitless opportunities presented by learning in the outdoors, as being truly absurd. We’ll eventually come to our senses and realise that an education that is not grounded in a full understanding of our environment and how we can build a sustainable future together is no education at all.

Paul’s blog is well worth keeping an eye on. Find him at http://www.sustainableretreat.blogspot.com/

 ……and if you’d like to read a draft of Growing Sustainable Communities – Our Great Work, send Paul an e-mail and he’ll e mail you a pdf copy.

Have a look at Incredible Edible too – join the movement!  http://www.incredible-edible-todmorden.co.uk/

 

Thanks Paul – my optimism is rekindled.

Chris May

Defining how we work

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

I’ve been spending a lot of time lately thinking about the practice that sits at the core of our work – our ‘approach’ if you like. This is where I’ve got to. 

  1. We approach every programme with an attitude of respect, humility, care and sensitivity
  2. We develop our understanding of the context, consulting with partners to be aware of political and social drivers,  local histories, demographics and dynamics.
  3. We map existing assets, researching the area in which we are working, to better understand the physical and social infrastructure, aiming to identify and value those assets.
  4. We identify and recruit local champions and leaders aiming to develop the capacity of existing leaders, grow local assets and empower community members
  5. We establish a meaningful presence by being creative, interested and interesting. We develop relationships, focus on listening and demonstrate the ability to connect, engage and involve.
  6. We work with partners to identify gaps and barriers to progress and find ways for the community to overcome these themselves
  7. We co-create needs based programmes of activity tailored specifically to the context
  8. We work in a purposeful manner which leads to tangible outcomes that everyone can understand
  9. We constantly broaden the range of partners involved, the types of activity on offer and the breadth of experience available.
  10. We carefully evaluate impact, learning, change and distance travelled. Ensuring objectives are shared and fully owned. We encourage everyone to see everything as an opportunity for learning and build quality by reflecting on success and failure, constantly adapting and changing in response to changing needs and informed feedback
  11. We celebrate progress, welcome visitors, share learning in networks and publicise successes widely
  12. We ensure developments and changes are sustained and sustainable

 

I wonder what others think of this 12 stage model. Where does it resonate with your own practice?  For now I’m referring to it as an ‘asset valuing model’ and I think it sits in contrast to models of cultural development that to me seem paternalistic and outmoded. There are parallels of course with a range of community capacity building initiatives here in the UK and possibly more commonly in the developing world. I’d greatly value comments or criticisms either in the comment section here of directly to chris.may@curiousminds.org.uk. If you know of similar or comparable models, I’d love to hear about them.

Happy Easter!

Chris May

Core 2

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Core2

An opportunity to visit the Whitworth Gallery is always very welcome, and on Tuesday it was the venue for the second Cultural Offer Regional Event. I’m a member of the Regional Cultural Offer Development Group and alongside colleagues from the Arts Learning Consortium, The Specialist Schools and Academies Trust, North West Vision & Media, MLA, The Centre for Urban Education and Arts Council North West, have been involved in planning this event for some months now. Building on the success of last year’s event at Haydock Race course, representatives from cultural organisations and local authorities gathered to find out about the progress has been made in Find Your Talent pathfinder areas in the North – Leeds, North & South Tyneside, Liverpool City Region and Bolton – and in the non-pathfinder local authorities who maintain a commitment to developing an entitlement to rich cultural provision for children and young people. It’s fair to say that the cultural sector was very well represented while local authority support, especially at a senior level was pretty thin on the ground. But at the same time it was equally apparent that a huge amount of work needs to happen for the cultural sector to be fully capable of delivering a universal cultural offer that fully puts the needs of children and young people at its heart.

A group of inspiring young people involved in projects across the region kicked off the event with a superb provocation. Their message resonated with my long held belief that access to high quality culture is a rights issue and as professionals we should concentrate our efforts on empowering young people to make active choices about cultural participation – thereby building their capacity to make other choices in their lives.

Their key messages were:

  • Simple is good
  • Do less, but better
  • Develop effective central information points
  • Recycle and renew ideas
  • Communicate brilliantly

Sarah Gbeleyi, a young woman from Manchester who is involved in a number of arts projects and who has been ably supported by Community Arts North West, worked with me in the two breakout groups in which I was involved and made a really valuable contribution to proceedings. Sarah was really good at reminding us that it is really important to carefully capture starting points within evaluation processes, in order to fully understand any gains that take place and that young people need to be helped to progress onto further activities once their enthusiasm has been stimulated. It’s too often the case that projects achieve great things but then leave young people stranded, with expectations raised, together with a confusing sense of what might be next. Throughout the conversation Sarah challenged us to keep young people at the core of our thinking – it was invaluable for us to have her in the group.

In the breakout group that I helped facilitate, there was a very real sense that the cultural sector needs to work much harder with partners to measure and report impact more effectively. We’ve all known about this for a while now and its frustrating that progress seems so slow. Curious Minds has a wealth of experience in this area that we are happy to share with others – do get in touch if you want to share thinking.

…and if you’ve a chance to get to the Whitworth, check out their fantastic exhibition on wallpaper – Walls Are Talking: Wallpaper, Art and Culture The first major UK exhibition of artists’ wallpapers with work by over 30 artists including Andy Warhol, Sarah Lucas and Damien Hirst. It is fantastic.

http://www.whitworth.manchester.ac.uk/whatson/exhibitions/wallsaretalking/

Chris May